DeepSense Forum

Questions about bea...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Questions about beam scanning and the dataset


Sachira
 Sachira
Guest
Joined: 4 weeks ago
Posts: 1
Topic starter  

Hi, and thanks for the great work in releasing this dataset.

I was hoping whether you would be able to provide us with information on the following if available:

  1. Are there any datasets within DeepSense 6G that involve more than one transmitter in a given instance?
  2. Similarly, do you have any datasets that include more than one base station?
  3. How is the received signal power measured during beam scanning? Could you provide insights on the duration of each beam scan and whether the received signal power from one beam is averaged over multiple measurements?
  4. Regarding the beam sweeping technique mentioned in your study, do you use an exhaustive search and scan beams one by one? Also, how do you generate the oversampled codebook?

 

Additionally, I have a question regarding the performance evaluation outlined in your paper: "User Identification: A Key Enabler for Multi-User Vision-Aided Communications",

  1. Could you elaborate on the methodology used to calculate the accuracy as per the equation (7) mentioned in your paper? Specifically, do you verify the predicted centres up to a certain decimal point against the ground truth?

Thank you!


David liked
QuoteSolved
WILAB
Member Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 11
 

Hi Sachira,

 

Thank you for your interest in the DeepSense 6G dataset. Please find the answers to your queries below:

  1. Multiple Transmitters and Base Stations: In our published scenarios, we currently do not have any that include more than one transmitter or base station. However, we do offer a distributed scenario with two distributed nodes alongside a transmitter and receiver. Each node is equipped with a GPS receiver and an RGB camera. Please refer to https://www.deepsense6g.net/scenario-41/&source=gmail&ust=1713295698430000&usg=AOvVaw22F-Gpj3nPsqa8y9FibUj p">Scenario 41 for detailed information.

  2. Received Signal Power Measurement: The received beam power is determined by averaging the power from a set of samples collected via a USRP. The number of samples can vary significantly depending on the testbed configuration and the processing capabilities. For instance, the V2V testbed averages the power over fewer samples than Testbed 1 due to the increased number of sensors in the testbed. The number of samples acquired per beam varies between 64*50 samples and 64*500 samples. Since the sampling rate of the B210s is always the same (61.44 MSamples/s), the sampling interval varies between 0.5 ms (half of a millisecond) and 0.05 ms. Note that each beam measurement takes less than ~1.5 ms to allow for measuring 64 beams 10x per second, which is why we do not acquire more samples. Note further that this should not make a difference because the average number of samples is usually enough to make a good measurement.

  3. Beam Sweeping Technique: We do a sequential beam sweep across each beam in the codebook, following the same order each time. The codebook is an oversampled version of the DFT codebook. The codebook has an oversampling factor of 4 (note that we have 64 beams in the codebook but only 16 antennas) - this is the default codebook that is shipped with the phased arrays. You can find the codebook on the https://www.deepsense6g.net/data-collection/&source=gmail&ust=1713295698430000&usg=AOvVaw17IB7JTyMKHO0C5VZoOv6 O">Data Collection page

  4. Performance Evaluation Methodology: To identify the user in the wireless environment, we first use additional sensing modalities (e.g., GPS position or mmWave power vectors) and a pre-trained ML model to predict probable transmitter center coordinates. It is important to note that these predictions are just estimates, not actual user coordinates. Next, the YOLOv3 model is employed to determine the bounding box center coordinates of all the objects of interest in the wireless environment. We then calculate the Euclidean distance between these predicted coordinates and those of all detected objects. The object with the minimum distance to the predicted transmitter coordinates is identified as the transmitter. Both predicted, and ground-truth coordinates are considered with a precision of up to four decimal places in this work.

Should you require further information or have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to reach out.

Thanks and Regards, 
Team DeepSense


ReplyQuote
David
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 0
 

Thanks for your answering. However, I still have some questions on the received signal power. I want to add noise to this raw data for my research, so I need to know the power of the transmitted symbols, as well as the symbol type, that is being used to calculate the noise power through the signal-to-noise ratio. 

Thanks.

Best Regards

<a href="https://bit.ly/grabJP138">Daftar Situs Slot Gacor</a>
<a href="https://scatterfull.com/">Situs Slot Online Mudah Menang</a>
<a href="https://ajjimusic.com/">Daftar Situs Taruhan Judi Bola Online</a>


ReplyQuote
joao_WILAB
Member Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 1
 

Hi @david,

Thank you for your patience.
 
For practical purposes, our measured signals already contain noise naturally present in the environment and hardware. The noise level can be estimated by computing the minimum received power in a 64-beam sample, and the signal level can be calculated by computing the maximum. 
 
Note that the powers measured are relative. They are consistent and can be compared with one another, but the value does not represent an absolute power level. 
 
Please let me know if further clarification is needed.
 
Best regards,
João

ReplyQuote

Leave a reply

Author Name

Author Email

Title *

 
Preview 0 Revisions Saved